Other than crying, one of the things that “we can do about it” is stop pushing higher crime nonwhite groups into white neighborhoods in the name of diversity and forcing people to defend themselves against nonwhite savagery. Is there some other reason people want guns? If not, then Mr. Kimmel is at least as responsible for Paddock’s rampage in Las Vegas as any of us who defend the right to bear arms. Do gooders and empty-headed virtue signalers like Kimmel will tearfully complain that we want the 2nd amendment upheld even when it supposedly puts us at risk for being mowed down by deranged boomers, but he refuses to recognize why people want it upheld. He refuses to recognize that the 2nd amendment is necessary in his multiracial, tolerant, vibrant multicultural utopia where Obama’s HUD could use section 8 to push violent nonwhite groups on unsuspecting, formerly safe white communities. The cause and effect is clear: Diversity is the cause. The effect is a white population that refuses to allow ZOG to take their guns.
Normies and the left need to understand that part of the real world cost of “diversity” is staunch opposition to any and all gun control measures because people have no other means of defending themselves in the 3rd world garbage dump of a society they’re hell bent on are creating. But of course they’ll never make this connection because nobody can draw their attention to it without being persecuted as a racist for having done so.
Kimmel, who no doubt can afford to buy his way out of state mandated cultural enrichment, acts like it’s less tragic when working class whites who aren’t as fortunate have their sons killed for their car keys because one of the left’s magical pet niggers was socially constructed into a murderous savage by the nefarious cishetero capitalist patriarchy, or less tragic when communities are permanently destroyed by people having to live in fear of it. This is “diversity” in the real world. If it was so important to Kimmel, he’d listen when people complain about higher black & immigrant crime. Clearly it isn’t important enough to him if listening means risking being called a racist. So they can save the fucking tears and theatrics. It’s meaningless.
People won’t give up their guns because niggers. There. The debate is over. To the leftist, the world is an exceedingly complicated place where everything must be turned into an autistic Marxist theory of sociology or political economy. But really, most of it can be explained with “because niggers.” Variations on this: “Because low IQ,” “because immigrants.” It really isn’t that complicated. There isn’t a single long standing policy debate which can’t be solved by simply refusing to talk about race in code.
“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” Incorrect. Niggers kill people. Racial groups with lower IQs kill people at higher rates per capita, therefore nobody will tolerate gun control.
Of course, leftists know this. That’s why they call you a racist. It’s also why they think they can win the debate, because they fully expect you to have bought into the egalitarian frame. So both of you are supposed to agree that racism is unacceptable while you tip-toe around the issue and the leftist plays Torquemada. “Check mate, racist,” thinks the smug leftist as he vomits up his unimaginative and predictable anti 2nd amendment boilerplate culled from Mother Jones while fully understanding that when you say “people” you mean “black people.”
You should be able to shut him down easily. He’s arguing that ordinary people on which he forces nonwhite savagery and violence shouldn’t have a means of defending themselves and their families. It’s indefensible, yet he doesn’t have to defend anything. It’s you who has to defend the 2nd amendment and try to fit white political interests into a false universalist framework because you’re unable to call a spade a spade. Pun intended. That’s why you’re prattling on about the founders and the Constitution while he can point to a pile of dead bodies and call you a monster for refusing to allow ZOG to confiscate your only means of defending yourself. Observe the actual track record of conservative culture war 4D chess. All it did was rob us of the ability to defend our interests, it robbed us even of the language we would use to do it.
The solution is to reject this frame and to impose your own, the solution is to defend “racism,” or the perspective of the gun owner who wants a means of self defense in a country where low IQ racial groups threaten his family. The strongest and most clever strategy is no strategy at all. It’s simply to tell the truth. Had conservatives done this from the beginning, we wouldn’t even be discussing it.
“But what about normies?” Why do you think archetypal, eternal normie would agree that ordinary people don’t have a right to defend themselves? Nobody would agree. The only reason it seems as if they would is because they don’t understand what the debate is about. The reason they don’t understand what the debate is about is because of your moronic 4D chess culture war strategy where you avoid explicitly talking about race. There isn’t any other reason.
You would have no reason to conceal your actual position unless you believed there was something wrong with it. There isn’t. You don’t have to apologize for believing that people should have a right to self defense in a country where we’ve refused to lock the apes up in their zoo cages.
Leftists love to point out that opponents of Muslim immigration are paranoid and misguided, since the odds of being killed in a terrorist attack are low. Well, the odds of you being killed by a mass shooter are probably similar to the odds of being killed by a serial killer or a terrorist. The odds of you being a victim of random nigger violence, by contrast, can be pretty high, depending on where you live. So it’s perfectly rational for somebody to want a gun to defend himself because he’s worried more about random nigger violence than mass shooters, regardless of what race those shooters are, even if it were true that they were all white men, which it isn’t anyway.
This is a far stronger argument than blubbering about abstractions and the Constitution because you’re afraid of being called a racist. Leftists don’t care about the Constitution. And in the middle of a dramatic news cycle like this one, even normies are less inclined to care about it. We’re stuck in this position because we can’t connect our opposition to gun control to a legitimate and rational desire for a means of defending ourselves. Would we need to defend ourselves if the left wasn’t flooding our countries and communities with nonwhite savages?
If the left wants to discuss gun control, then they’ll have to give up mass immigration and forced racial diversity. There’s no discussion of it until then. “Gun control is a luxury that only racially homogeneous societies can afford.” That’s all you have to say, but in order to say it – to win the damn debate once and for all – you have to stop cucking on race. You have to make the implicit explicit.
Once we do that, it’s relatively easy for normies to see that there is no possibility of gun control for the same reason there’s no possibility of single payer: You’re flooding the country with low IQ nonwhites, making both impossible. Were it not for that, maybe we could reach a compromise & they could get some of what they want. It’s real fucking simple: People want guns because they have no other means of self defense when Obama’s HUD pushes statistically higher crime nonwhites into their formerly safe white neighborhoods. The left can sacrifice gun control for diversity just like everything else. Sorry, leftist, things like single payer and gun control measures are things that only homogeneous white societies can realistically achieve. I don’t know what to tell you.
The irony, of course, is that we really wouldn’t even need gun control were it not for nonwhites.
So every time the left brings up guns, you need to make the debate about race. No more talking in code, no more shibboleths and dog whistles. Let’s see how long it takes them to realize that their position in the gun control debate won’t survive a public discourse where we can acknowledge race explicitly. We got this. They have nothing. It doesn’t matter how horrific some nutter’s shooting spree is, all you have to do is blast them with the black gun crime statistics.
The overwhelming majority of per capita gun crime in the United States is committed by blacks. The white gun crime rate is on par with Belgium. We don’t have a gun problem, we have a nigger problem. Every time they bring up gun control, be as mercilessly explicitly about race as possible. The gun is good.